Some guy got pulled over in South Carolina for his
“anatomically correct” display on the rear end of his pickup truck (!). Um, how
is having a replica of testicles on a motor vehicle in any way “anatomically correct”? Trucks don’t have nuts! So
isn’t it anatomically incorrect,
but additionally, perhaps it’s obscene? (If that’s what they want to do.) But it’s really politically incorrect!
Look, we all know where this is headed, right? This is going
to the Supreme Court as gender discrimination! Why? Well, because it’s sexist!
And why is that? Well, obviously because women could put “truck ovaries” on
their trucks, and because ovaries are not, in and of themselves, considered
obscene, even though they are the direct female reproductive equivalent to
testicles, this would make it sexist. And that’s discriminatory! (Duh! You
sexist!)
The fact that none of them would put truck ovaries on their trucks is immaterial! They could do it, and get away with it, so it is unfair, plain and simple!
So this is obviously gender discrimination of the highest
order! And just to protest, we should all put truck ovaries on our pickup
trucks! (It’s not just because I just started a line of truck ovaries! That is
incidental and immaterial! I’m simply fighting for equal rights for everyone!
{And it will only cost you $500 per set! A bargain at any price to fight for
equality!} [<This is a joke: there is no such thing as truck ovaries, and
even if there is, I don’t make them!])
Here’s the sickening sexist story:
Although, someone has made the argument that the Dodge Ram
logo looks like a female reproductive anatomical diagram, and it’s hard to
argue with:
